Translate this page into:
Difficult embryo transfer: Challenges, techniques, and solutions – our experience
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Banerjee K, Arora N. Difficult embryo transfer: Challenges, techniques, and solutions – our experience. J Reprod Healthc Med. 2026;7:14. doi: 10.25259/JRHM_46_2025
Abstract
Embryo transfer (ET) is a critical step in the success of in vitro fertilization, yet it can be technically challenging in a small but significant proportion of cases. These challenges arise due to anatomical variations and acquired conditions affecting the cervix and uterus. Difficult ET is associated with reduced pregnancy rates, increased procedural complexity, and patient discomfort. This review explores the multifactorial causes of difficult ET, including cervical stenosis, uterine angulation, and technical factors. It highlights the role of pre-procedural assessment, ultrasound guidance, and catheter selection in improving outcomes. In addition, we discuss practical strategies for managing difficult transfers, supported by current evidence and clinical experience. Through a structured synthesis of literature and clinical insights, this article provides a comprehensive and practical guide for clinicians to optimize ET outcomes in challenging scenarios.
Keywords
Catheter navigation
Cervical stenosis
Difficult transfer
Embryo transfer
Embryo transfer techniques
In vitro fertilization
Ultrasound guidance
Uterine angulation
INTRODUCTION
Embryo transfer (ET) is a critical and technically sensitive step in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, directly influencing implantation and pregnancy outcomes. While most ETs are straightforward, approximately 5–7% are technically difficult and may adversely affect clinical success rates.[1] Studies suggest that 17–34% of transfers are moderately complex, requiring minor adjustments, while 7–17% are classified as difficult, often necessitating additional interventions such as cervical dilation or tenaculum application.[2]
Difficult ETs may involve anatomical abnormalities, technical complications, or patient-related factors that hinder smooth catheter navigation and embryo placement. This review explores the causes, challenges, and evidence-based solutions for difficult ETs, highlighting advanced strategies supported by recent studies and clinical publications as well as experience in our fertility clinic.
Difficult ETs are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates. A recent meta-analysis reported a significant reduction in clinical pregnancy rates (odds ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64–0.76) in difficult ET cases.[3] In addition, traumatic transfers may induce uterine contractions, further compromising implantation success.[4]
These challenges may arise due to cervical stenosis, uterine angulation, anatomical abnormalities, or technical factors. Given the physical, emotional, and financial burden of IVF, optimizing the ET technique is essential.
This review aims to provide a structured overview of the causes of difficult ET, along with evidence-based strategies and practical solutions to improve clinical outcomes.
PRE-PROCEDURAL PREPARATION
Proper preparation plays a crucial role in minimizing the risk of difficult ET. A detailed patient history should be obtained, including prior intrauterine insemination, hysterosalpingography, previous ETs, pelvic surgeries, and any known uterine anomalies. Conditions such as pelvic inflammatory disease or Asherman’s syndrome may predispose to cervical stenosis and difficult catheter passage. In addition, endometrial polyps, uterine fibroids, or congenital abnormalities such as a septate uterus can obstruct smooth catheter passage.
A mock ET can be useful in identifying cervical alignment, uterine depth, and potential obstructions. While routine use before the first IVF cycle does not significantly improve pregnancy rates, it provides valuable anatomical insights that help guide subsequent procedures. Sueldo et al. emphasize that mock transfers significantly improve the accuracy and ease of the actual ET, thereby enhancing the overall success of assisted reproductive technology.[5] A randomized controlled trial by Borkar et al. examined the impact of mock ET (MET) before the first IVF cycle. The study highlighted that while MET is often reserved for patients with a history of difficult transfers, its routine use before the first IVF attempt offers no significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates. However, it provides valuable insights into uterine anatomy and potential challenges, allowing for a more tailored approach in subsequent cycles.[6]
Ultrasound guidance has been shown to improve pregnancy rates and increase the likelihood of atraumatic transfers.[7] A moderately full bladder facilitates better visualization by straightening the uterocervical angle; however, overdistension should be avoided as it may distort anatomy and cause patient discomfort.[8] Figure 1 represents a full bladder required during ET.

Cervical preparation is equally important. Cleaning the cervix with sterile saline or culture media removes mucus, which may otherwise obstruct the catheter tip or lead to embryo retention.[9,10] Figure 2 shows how the instrument trolley is set up to facilitate the process of ET.

For patients with a history of difficult or painful transfers, administering muscle relaxants or analgesics before the procedure can help reduce cervical resistance, making the transfer smoother.[11] In cases where patients experience severe discomfort or anatomical challenges, general anesthesia may be necessary. In addition, pre-treatment with vaginal estrogen or cervical priming agents can soften the cervical tissue, making catheter insertion easier, particularly in patients with cervical stenosis or a rigid cervical canal.[12]
CLASSIFICATION OF CHALLENGES IN ET
Difficulties encountered during ET can be broadly classified into:
Visualization challenges
Factors affecting visualization:
Suboptimal ultrasound settings,
Inadequate or excessive bladder filling,
Obesity or abdominal scars, and
Uterine adhesions or displacements.
Entry challenges
Vaginismus,
Narrow or stenotic cervical os,
Posterior or Elevated cervix, and
Vaginal or cervical obstruction as represented in Figure 3 showing a vaginal cyst blocking the entry of the ET catheter.

Negotiation challenges
Cervical tortuosity,
Acute uterine angulation,
False passage formation,
Fibrotic internal os, and
Fibroids near the cervical canal.
MANAGEMENT OF DIFFICULT ET
Optimization of visualization
Ultrasound guidance remains the cornerstone of accurate ET. Proper adjustment of depth, focus, and contrast improves visualization of the endometrial cavity and catheter tip. Performing the procedure in a dimly lit room further enhances image clarity. By carefully fine-tuning these ultrasound parameters, clinicians can significantly improve the precision and effectiveness of the ET procedure, leading to better clinical outcomes.[9]
Bladder filling should be optimized to improve the uterine axis without causing distortion. In obese patients or those with abdominal scars, probe positioning and angulation may need modification.
Advanced techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) guidance can be particularly useful in patients with poor transabdominal visualization or complex anatomy. Figure 4 represents a TVUS-guided ET procedure.
Measurement Technique: After positioning the outer catheter at the internal os, measure the distance to the maximum implantation potential and then place embryos accordingly at the point
Feel Technique: When visualization is limited, estimate the uterine-cervical length (typically ~2.5 cm) and place embryos based on tactile feedback. While less precise, it remains an effective alternative in challenging cases.
Echogenic Catheters: Echogenic catheters enhance the success of challenging ETs by improving visibility under ultrasound guidance. These catheters have echogenic markers or coatings, typically made of microbubbles or metallic particles, which reflect ultrasound waves, making the catheter tip more visible. This improved visualization is especially beneficial in patients with complex uterine anatomy, such as sharply anteverted or retroverted uteri, cervical stenosis, or tortuous cervical canals. Clear identification of the catheter tip ensures accurate embryo placement, while the observation of air bubbles entering the cavity confirms correct positioning, enhancing procedural precision and potentially improving pregnancy outcomes.[13,14]

Management of entry difficulties
Mild sedation or anesthesia may be considered in selected cases to reduce discomfort and facilitate cervical relaxation. Evidence suggests that anesthesia does not adversely affect pregnancy outcomes.[15] A study conducted by Banerjee and Singla comparing ETs performed with and without anesthesia found no significant difference in success rates.[15]
In cases of cervical stenosis, gentle dilation or the use of smaller or angled catheters may aid entry. A Sims speculum may provide better exposure compared to Cusco’s speculum in difficult cases. Stabilization of the cervix using a tenaculum or vulsellum can help align the uterocervical axis and facilitate catheter insertion. In our clinical practice, when the cervical opening is extremely narrow, a small incision may occasionally be performed to facilitate ET as shown in Figure 5. If minor bleeding occurs following the procedure, gentle pressure is applied to manage it effectively and maintain optimal conditions for implantation.

When dealing with cervical obstructions, we have observed that using an outer catheter with a stylet can help navigate the blockage. It is essential to avoid applying excessive force, as it can damage cervical tissues and reduce implantation rates.
For patients with high or hard-to-reach cervices, we have observed that using angled catheters or Sim’s speculum can enhance access and simplify navigation. In cases of cervical stenosis, severe angulation, obesity, or poor visualization, gently stabilizing the cervix with instruments such as a vulsellum may be necessary to ensure proper embryo deposition.
Management of negotiation difficulties
Difficulties during ET often arise after entering the cervical canal, especially when navigating a curved or rigid uterine path. Several conditions can complicate this negotiation process.
A false passage in the cervix can occur when the catheter strays from the intended cervical path, often due to incorrect handling or excessive force. This misdirection may lead the catheter to move outside the cervical canal, complicating accurate embryo placement and potentially lowering implantation success rates. Occasionally, cervical stenosis or an acute angulation between the cervix and the uterus limits uterine access and makes ET difficult.[16] This can make catheter navigation difficult. This condition creates resistance, making it harder to advance the catheter into the uterine cavity, requiring precise manipulation or specialized catheter types for successful ET.
A sharply anteverted or retroverted uterus can further complicate catheter placement by altering the cervical trajectory. This challenge can be managed using angled catheters or manual uterine adjustments during the procedure to improve alignment and facilitate smooth catheter passage.
Navigating the cervical canal and uterine cavity requires careful technique. Flexible or soft catheters are preferred in tortuous or angulated anatomy, as they reduce trauma and improve ease of passage.[17,18]
Figure 6 represents the uterine anatomy by TVUS and the personalization of the ET based on anatomical characteristics of the uterus.

A slow, controlled approach should be adopted to avoid false passage formation. Ultrasound guidance combined with tactile feedback helps ensure correct catheter positioning.
In cases of significant resistance, switching to a firmer catheter or using a stylet may facilitate passage. However, excessive force should always be avoided.
STEPWISE APPROACH TO DIFFICULT ET
-
Difficult to negotiate with previous history
Mock ET – A mock ET is a preparatory procedure performed before the actual ET to evaluate the cervical and uterine pathway. It helps identify potential difficulties and guides the selection of the appropriate catheter and technique. This improves the chances of a smooth and successful ET.
Cervical dilatation and hysteroscopic correction: In cases of difficult ET due to cervical stenosis or tortuosity, various cervical dilation and hysteroscopic correction methods can be employed. Techniques include cervical canal shaving and dilation, refashioning of the cervical canal with Versa point,[19] hysteroscopic evaluation combined with Malecot catheter placement, and hysteroscopic MyoSure morcellation to remove intrauterine obstructions, ensuring smoother and more effective ET. All these are done before the actual ET.
Provisionally under general anesthesia – It helps by relaxing the uterine and cervical muscles, minimizing patient movement, and allowing the doctor to manipulate the cervix more easily. It reduces pain and discomfort, enabling a smoother and more controlled transfer, especially when resistance, cervical stenosis, or severe uterine angulation is present. At our center, we employ general anesthesia in select difficult cases and have found that it makes the procedure easier to perform and increases the likelihood of a successful transfer.
Prophylactic oxytocin antagonist (Atosiban); A study by Moraloglu et al. suggests that treatment with oxytocin antagonists before ET may significantly enhance implantation rates in IVF cycles by reducing uterine contractility, thereby promoting better embryo adhesion and improving overall pregnancy outcomes.[20]
In cases of incidental difficult ET with no previous history, several methods can aid in successful catheter navigation. Techniques include smooth movements, checking directions, and angulations, using a firmer catheter, or employing a stylet. Holding the cervix with a tenaculum to straighten the axis, gentle sounding, or trans myometrial ET may also facilitate the procedure difficult to negotiate without previous history.[18] At our center, we have found that simply switching to a firmer catheter resolves the difficulty in most such cases, allowing for a smooth and successful transfer.
TECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE ET
Direct transfer: The embryologist loads the embryos, which are immediately transferred to the uterine cavity.
Afterload technique: The outer catheter is positioned at the internal OS, and the inner catheter is subsequently loaded and inserted. This method minimizes embryo exposure time and ensures accuracy.
The clinician performing the ET plays a pivotal role in determining its success. Their expertise, precision, and adaptability are essential, particularly in difficult cases. Skilled handling of complex anatomical challenges, precise catheter navigation, and the ability to make real-time adjustments significantly influence the accuracy of embryo placement. The human factor is a critical determinant of IVF success, as the clinician performing the ET significantly impacts the cycle outcome. Cirillo et al.[21]
INNOVATIONS
Recent advancements in ET technology have improved procedural accuracy and success rates. The use of 3D and 4D ultrasound offers enhanced spatial visualization of the uterine cavity, helping clinicians detect abnormalities and optimize catheter trajectory. These imaging techniques are particularly helpful in identifying fibroids, endometrial polyps, or adhesions that could interfere with catheter placement. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging guidance is being explored for complex cases with severe anatomical distortions, providing detailed visualization of the pelvic structures.
CONCLUSION
Difficult ETs present significant clinical challenges, but careful preparation, appropriate technique, and the use of modern technology can optimize outcomes. A structured and individualized approach, combined with operator expertise, is essential to achieving atraumatic and effective ET. Continuous refinement of techniques and ongoing training remain crucial for improving success rates and enhancing patient experience in IVF.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Evaluation of a strategy for difficult embryo transfers from a prospective series of 2,046 transfers. F S Rep. 2021;2:43-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2632-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Impact of difficult embryo transfer on the success of IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13:22188.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comparison of easy and difficult embryo transfer outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;6:232-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Trial embryo transfer (mock transfer) In: Allahbadia GN, ed. Human embryo transfer. New Delhi: Springer; 2015. p. :7-10.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020;18:951-60.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Fertil Steril. 2024;106:605-12.
- [Google Scholar]
- Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:785-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Embryo transfer technique as a determinant of success in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:1823-32.
- [Google Scholar]
- Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:308-13.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Use of analgesics during embryo transfer and its impact on clinical outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41:875-82.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cervical priming with estrogen prior to embryo transfer in difficult cases: A randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:2401-10.
- [Google Scholar]
- Techniques for performing embryo transfer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:446-57.
- [Google Scholar]
- Improved outcomes with ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: Evidence from randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:884-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Impact of general anesthesia during embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes. Int J Sci Res. 2021;10(2):63-4.
- [Google Scholar]
- Embryo transfer: Techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:863-70.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3114-21.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Use of Versapoint to refashion the cervical canal to overcome unusually difficult embryo transfers and improve in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: A case series. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4:12-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treatment with oxytocin antagonists before embryo transfer may increase implantation rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:338-43.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The human factor: Does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome? Hum Reprod. 2020;35:275-82.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

